The Ironies of Getting My Second Book Of Poetry Published

July 21st, 2009 § 1

Two days ago, I received a let­ter from Milk­weed Edi­tions reject­ing my sec­ond book of poems, which is called All That Strug­gled In You Not To Drown. In explain­ing his deci­sion, the edi­tor wrote, “Although I rec­og­nize here an orig­i­nal and com­pelling per­sona, I felt that the pre­pon­der­ance of first-person poems with an auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal slant lim­ited the poten­tial appeal.” In other words, if I under­stand him cor­rectly, he thinks that the first-person nar­ra­tives dom­i­nat­ing the book will make it hard both to sell and to get a decent level of crit­i­cal atten­tion. Whether or not that is true, his per­cep­tion of the man­u­script is accu­rate – it is made up almost entirely of first-person nar­ra­tives – and, given that accu­racy, if he can­not find within his own aes­thetic sense and/or his sense of where poetry is these days and/or his sense of the mar­ket enough enthu­si­asm for pub­lish­ing my book, I think his rejec­tion is a fair and rea­son­able one. It’s also ironic, because CavanKerry Press, pub­lisher of my first book of poems, The Silence Of Men, rejected All That Strug­gled In You Not To Drown because there was not enough of an auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal slant. “I’ve seen this a lot,” CKP’s pub­lisher told me. “A poet whose first book is deeply per­sonal will often write a sec­ond book that is just the oppo­site. You’ve writ­ten a good book; it’s just too imper­sonal for our list.” This rejec­tion (more irony here) also seems to me to have been fair and rea­son­able. For while All That Strug­gled In You Not To Drown is, to me, deeply per­sonal and auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal, it pos­sesses and explores those char­ac­ter­is­tics dif­fer­ently than The Silence Of Men does, and if CKP’s list is slanted towards the kinds of poems that are in The Silence Of Men, then it makes sense that CKP would also reject my sec­ond book.

I have a lot of respect for the work that small press edi­tors and pub­lish­ers do, not just because it is so often un– or under­paid work – which it is, and which is some­thing that any writer who deals with them needs to under­stand and appre­ci­ate – but also because pub­lish­ing books requires a com­mit­ment to under­stand­ing, artic­u­lat­ing and either implic­itly or explic­itly defend­ing one’s own aes­thetic sense in a highly sat­u­rated and com­pet­i­tive mar­ket­place. Espe­cially when it comes to poetry. Some­times it seems to me that every­one and her or his aunt or uncle in the United States thinks that he or she is a poet whose work the world absolutely must have between the cov­ers of a book or burned onto a CD or DVD. More to the point – at least in my expe­ri­ence – more than a few of the peo­ple who think this way haven’t read (or at least write like they haven’t read) a sin­gle book of con­tem­po­rary poetry. To be a small press edi­tor and/or pub­lisher in this kind of envi­ron­ment is to sub­mit one­self to a mind-numbing onslaught of lan­guage, which takes a level of com­mit­ment that most lit­er­ary peo­ple I know, includ­ing myself, can­not and will not make; and that com­mit­ment ought to com­mand our respect, even when it means that a given pub­lisher decides not to pub­lish a book we have written.

Please don’t mis­un­der­stand me. I think any­one who wants to write poetry should write poetry. The impulse towards poetic expres­sion is a pow­er­ful one; wit­ness the way peo­ple turn to poetry in times of dif­fi­culty, from per­sonal tragedies like the death of a loved one to national tragedies like the Sep­tem­ber 11th attacks. More­over, the good that poetry does for the peo­ple who write it, and for the peo­ple who read it, what­ever kind of poetry it is, is not some­thing that can be mea­sured by either the dol­lars and cents that a pub­lisher com­mits to putting a book out or the unpaid hours that the poet sweats through try­ing to make her or his lines bespeak the par­tic­u­lar expe­ri­ence he or she wants to com­mu­ni­cate. Still, there is a dif­fer­ence – actu­ally, there are prob­a­bly many dif­fer­ences – between being some­one who writes poems and some­one who wants to pub­lish books of poetry, not the least of which is that once you decide you want to pub­lish books of poetry, you have made the deci­sion to treat your work as a com­mod­ity. You have entered, whether you like it or not, the world of (usu­ally very small) busi­ness; and so I have to con­fess that the let­ter from Milk­weed Edi­tions is one I should never have received. Instead, I should have writ­ten to them and with­drawn All That Strug­gled In You Not To Drown from con­sid­er­a­tion because a third press had already agreed to pub­lish it.

I didn’t con­tact Milk­weed because I’d allowed my record-keeping to become sloppy and so I’d actu­ally for­got­ten I’d sub­mit­ted the book to them; and so I am relieved that Milk­weed rejected my book, since it means I do not have to deal with the awk­ward­ness of hav­ing to choose between two very fine pub­lish­ers. The world of small presses is not like the world of com­mer­cial pub­lish­ers, where the bid­ding war that can result from hav­ing more than one edi­tor eager to pub­lish your book can be a very good thing. There is not enough money in the small press world to make such a bid­ding war pos­si­ble. I may have only a ver­bal com­mit­ment from the press that has accepted All That Strug­gled In You Not To Drown–which is why I am not nam­ing that press in this post; our agree­ment will not be offi­cial until I have a con­tract, and a lot can hap­pen between a hand­shake and a con­tract – but pre­cisely because of the aes­thetic and other kinds of un– or under­paid edi­to­r­ial com­mit­ments I was talk­ing about above, the ver­bal com­mit­ment I have with this press means some­thing to me, and so it is a com­mit­ment that I want, all else being equal, to honor. If all goes accord­ing to plan, I will be very proud to pub­lish my book with this press, as I would have been proud to pub­lish with Milk­weed, or with CavanKerry Press. But here’s the final irony: The press that accepted my book did so for pre­cisely the rea­sons that Milk­weed rejected it, because of “the pre­pon­der­ance of first-person poems with an auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal slant,” which the edi­tor feels will help to gar­ner All That Strug­gled In You Not To Drown some seri­ous crit­i­cal atten­tion, while at the same time mak­ing the book some­thing that peo­ple will want to buy. Go figure.

§ One Response to “The Ironies of Getting My Second Book Of Poetry Published”

What's this?

You are currently reading The Ironies of Getting My Second Book Of Poetry Published at Richard Jeffrey Newman.

meta