What I’m Reading Now — 2

March 2nd, 2010 § 0

Some things I’ve been read­ing when I should’ve been grad­ing papers or doing other work:

  • A Tough Patron and an Old Ide­ol­ogy Give Women a Lift in Bul­gar­ian Pol­i­tics, by Dan Bilef­sky, The New York Times: What’s most inter­est­ing in this arti­cle about how Bul­gar­ian Prime Min­is­ter Boiko M. Borisov has been appoint­ing women to polit­i­cal offices are the expla­na­tions peo­ple give for why he is doing so and why women are needed in pol­i­tics. Boiko says, for exam­ple, “Women are more dili­gent than men, and they don’t take long lunches or got to the bar,” and also, “Women have stronger char­ac­ters than men because when they say no they mean no, and they are less cor­rupt­ible.” Oth­ers sug­gest that women are less cor­rupt­ible because they have more to lose, and oth­ers talk about the fact that while Bul­garia “never had a fem­i­nist move­ment” but that dur­ing “Com­mu­nism women in Bul­garia were rep­re­sented in almost every walk of life, from plant man­agers to medicine.”
  • An inter­est­ing piece in The Lede about the pol­i­tics behind Iran’s cap­ture and the tele­vised con­fes­sion of Abdol­malek Rigi, leader of Jun­dal­lah, a mil­i­tant group that claims to be defend­ing Sunni Mus­lims in Iran’s south­east and has killed hun­dreds of Iran­ian sol­diers and civil­ians since 2003. For some related arti­cles in the news try here, here and here.
  • In I Was the One Read­ing Andrew Mar­vell. You Were …, also in the Times, Alan Feuer turns some of the “Missed Con­nec­tions” post­ings on newyork​.craigslist​.org into found poems.
  • I appre­ci­ated “Thoughts on the ‘hookup cul­ture,’ or what I learned from my high school diary, a guest post on Fem­i­niste by Nona Willis Aronowitz. One of my favorite bits: “We need to admit as a cul­ture that teens are sex­ual beings, and that more often than not, sex­ual matu­rity has a com­pletely dif­fer­ent time­line than emo­tional maturity.”
  • Before I became a trans­la­tor, I was work­ing on what might have become a book explor­ing male het­ero­sex­u­al­ity and pornog­ra­phy, of course, was one of the things I was research­ing. At the time, I was very dis­ap­pointed at the nar­row­ness and often impov­er­ished nature of the dis­course I found not only about the rep­re­sen­ta­tion of men in het­ero­sex­ual video pornog­ra­phy (which was what I was look­ing at) but also in pornog­ra­phy that was touted as pro­gres­sive and even fem­i­nist. Per­haps one day I will return to that project, but in the mean time I have been enjoy­ing Male Sub­mis­sion Art, the mis­sion of which is to “show­case beau­ti­ful imagery where men and other male-identified peo­ple are sub­mis­sive sub­jects. We aim to chal­lenge stereo­types of the ‘pathetic’ sub­mis­sive man.” The images are often very cool, and what I like about the analy­sis is that its core tenet seems to be that for a man to “sub­mit” (what­ever that word might mean in any given con­text) is not, by def­i­n­i­tion, for him to unman him­self or to be unmanned by the one he is sub­mit­ting to (what­ever to “unman” might mean in any given con­text). Leav­ing aside the ques­tion of whether the par­tic­u­lar sex­u­al­ity expressed by the site is one’s cup of tea or not, it is – for me, any­way – a new, inter­est­ing and inter­est­ingly sub­ver­sive way of try­ing to trans­form what we mean when we say the words “man­hood” or “masculinity.”
  • It’s odd, and maybe a bit arro­gant sound­ing, to include some­thing that I’ve writ­ten in this list, but I’ve recently been putting together my appli­ca­tion for pro­mo­tion to full pro­fes­sor, which involved going through the two books of trans­la­tions that I’ve pub­lished. As I did so, I was reminded of how won­der­ful a poet Saadi was. (One of these days I have to add my work to the Wikipde­dia entry on him.) So these words may be mine, but they are some­one else’s work. It’s from Selec­tions from Saadi’s Gulis­tan:

The best thing for an igno­rant man is to be silent, and if he under­stands that, and prac­tices it, he will no longer be ignorant.

If the learn­ing you pos­sess is less than per­fect,
keep your tongue tucked safely in your mouth.
Empty words dis­grace the one who speaks them,
like serv­ing a wal­nut shell with­out a nut.
A fool was try­ing hard to teach his ass
to talk. A wise man watch­ing him observed,
“Aren’t you afraid of what they’ll say
when they find out what you’re doing? This beast
will never learn the trick of human speech.
Bet­ter you should learn the gift of silence.“
A man who does not think before he speaks
will almost always use the words fool­ishly.
If you will not take the time a wise man takes
to speak wisely, prac­tice an animal’s silence.

§ Leave a Reply

What's this?

You are currently reading What I’m Reading Now — 2 at Richard Jeffrey Newman.

meta